Markets Securities & Exchange Board
SEBI finds 96,000 artificial units from 2 reversal trades in BSE stock options
This order addresses SEBI's investigation into Gayatri Devi Choudhary for allegedly executing non-genuine reversal trades in illiquid stock options on the BSE, which created artificial trading volume.
SEBI found that these actions violated regulations prohibiting fraudulent and unfair trade practices.
Who it concerns: Gayatri Devi Choudhary (PAN: ACCPC0370P)
What SEBI found or ordered
- SEBI found that the Noticee executed 2 non-genuine reversal trades in the contract 'DISH15APR60.00CEW1' on March 24, 2015.
- These trades resulted in the creation of artificial volume of 96,000 units.
- The trades were executed with the counterparty Multiwyn Commercial Private Limited, with a buy at 14:54:37 and a sell at 15:06:48 on the same day.
- SEBI determined that the Noticee violated Regulations 3(a), (b), (c), (d), 4(1), and 4(2)(a) of the SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices Relating to Securities Market) Regulations, 2003.
- The Noticee did not respond to the Show Cause Notice or subsequent intimations, leading SEBI to proceed ex-parte and presume the allegations were admitted.
- The order notes that the Noticee's alleged non-genuine trades constituted 7.69% of total trades in that specific contract and 5.83% of the total market volume for that contract.
Also in the document
- The investigation period covered April 1, 2014, to September 30, 2015.
- SEBI noted that 14,720 entities were involved in executing non-genuine trades in the BSE stock options segment during the investigation period.
- The Noticee was one of many entities identified in a large-scale reversal of trades that led to artificial volume creation at BSE.
How this was written
An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.
✓ Figures checked. Every number in this summary was found in the document by an automated check.
That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.
The original document
Securities & Exchange Board of India (SEBI) — enforcement orders
Regulatory order · Ref. Order/AK/DS/2026-27/32413 · 22 May 2026
Read it here
Discussion
No one has discussed this document yet.