Saturday, 7 November 2026 कौन ज़िम्मेदार?
कौन ज़िम्मेदार?KaunZimmedar

Every story is a real government document.

Markets Securities & Exchange Board

SEBI finds ₹16.51 crore in accounts of unregistered PMS provider

This order addresses the violation of SEBI regulations by Mr. Nishaan Singh for providing unregistered Portfolio Management Services (PMS).

It details the reassessment of the amount collected for these services following a remand by the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) and a forensic audit.

Who it concerns: Mr. Nishaan Singh (Proprietor of Sanbun Investments and Sanbun Capital Hedge Fund)

What SEBI found or ordered

  • SEBI found that the Noticee violated Section 12(1) of the SEBI Act and Regulation 3 of the SEBI (Portfolio Manager) Regulations, 2020 by providing unregistered PMS.
  • The Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) upheld SEBI's initial findings but remitted the matter for reassessment of the quantum of money received and the period of debarment.
  • A Forensic Audit Report (FAR) dated July 16, 2025, was conducted by an empaneled auditor to assess PMS-related receipts in two HDFC bank accounts.
  • SEBI deemed the FAR findings inconclusive due to lack of sufficient documents and incomplete methodology, leading to a recalculation of the PMS amount.
  • SEBI recalculated the amount collected towards PMS activity at Rs. 13,42,38,054.90, excluding unrelated credits of Rs. 2,77,45,259.71 from the total credits of Rs. 16,19,83,314.61.
  • The Noticee's authorized representatives agreed to refund the amount as arrived in the FAR (Rs. 82,65,548.46) to expedite closure, but later sought to have the FAR findings considered over SEBI's recalculation.
  • Multiple personal hearings were held between February and May 2026, with the Noticee and his mother appearing on May 11, 2026, agreeing to refund monies as per the FAR findings.

Also in the document

  • The total credit entries in the two bank accounts under examination amounted to approximately Rs. 16.51 crores (Rs. 16,51,11,612.60) according to the Forensic Audit Report.
  • The SAT remitted the case specifically for reassessing the refund amount and debarment period, indicating the initial penalty was not fully finalized until this stage.
  • The auditor noted discrepancies such as students purchasing courses but not logging in, and informal service bundling (market tips) under the guise of educational delivery.

How this was written

An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.

✓ Figures checked. Every number in this summary was found in the document by an automated check.

That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.

How we work · Report an error in this story

The original document

Securities & Exchange Board of India (SEBI) — enforcement orders

Regulatory order · 26 May 2026

Order 26 May 2026 · 1.2 MB Open the document On sebi.gov.in ↗
Read it here

Discussion

Discuss the documents, not people. No doxxing of private individuals. Do not state allegations of crime or wrongdoing as fact — ask questions instead. Be civil. Posts that break these rules may be removed by moderators.

Sign in with Google to post

No one has discussed this document yet.