Markets Securities & Exchange Board
SEBI finds ₹1.20 crore in fees collected without valid NISM certifications
This order details SEBI's adjudication of violations by Rajiv Sharma, an investment adviser, regarding fee limits, certification compliance, and record-keeping identified during a thematic inspection.
1.20 croreSEBI noted that the Noticee collected Rs. 1.20 crore in investment advisory fees during FY 24-25 while allegedly la…
Who it concerns: Rajiv Sharma (Proprietor of M/s. Capital Life Market Research)
What SEBI found or ordered
- SEBI alleged violation of Regulation 15(3) of IA Regulations for failing to maintain arm's length distance between advisory activities and personal financial dealings (loans from clients routed through the same bank account).
- SEBI alleged violation of Regulations 7(2), 15(13), and 13(a) for carrying on advisory activities without valid NISM certifications (expired April 2024) and collecting Rs. 1.20 crore in fees during FY 24-25.
- SEBI alleged violations of Regulations 19(1)(a-h), 19(2), 19(3), 15(12), and 15(8) for failure to maintain complete client records, submit annual/periodic reports, and update KYC details for five clients.
- The Noticee claimed the excess amounts were personal loans, not fees, and that record-keeping failures were due to a crashed hard disk and misplaced documents.
- The Noticee failed to submit a written reply to the Show Cause Notice within the stipulated time (April 16, 2026) but was granted a hearing on May 13, 2026, and filed a reply on the same date.
Also in the document
- SEBI noted that the Noticee collected Rs. 1.20 crore in investment advisory fees during FY 24-25 while allegedly lacking valid NISM certifications.
- The inspection covered the period from April 01, 2023, to January 31, 2025, with the onsite inspection conducted on February 07, 2025.
How this was written
An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.
✓ Figures checked. Every number in this summary was found in the document by an automated check.
That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.
The original document
Securities & Exchange Board of India (SEBI) — enforcement orders
Regulatory order · Ref. Order/JS/YK/2026-27/32423 · 27 May 2026
Read it here
Discussion
No one has discussed this document yet.