कौन ज़िम्मेदार? KaunZimmedar
BrowseSEBI › regulatory order

Adjudication Order in respect of Bhavin Sureshbhai Thakkar in the matter of Evexia Lifecare Limited

SEBI closed 2026
Plain-language summary (AI-generated) — a quick read so you don't have to open the full PDF. May contain errors; the original document below is authoritative.

What is this order about?

SEBI issued an order against Bhavin Sureshbhai Thakkar for alleged market manipulation in trading Evexia Lifecare Limited shares, examining his trading patterns during a specific period.

Who it concerns

Bhavin Sureshbhai Thakkar (PAN: AFCPT8628L)

What was found or directed

  • Violated section 12A (a), (b), (c) of SEBI Act read with regulations 3(a), (b), (c), (d), 4(1), 4(2)(a), and 4(2)(e) of PFUTP Regulations
  • Contributed ₹59.48 to total market positive LTP (40.85% of total market positive LTP)
  • Placed 179 single-share buy orders (81.73% of total buy trades) contributing ₹53.16 to positive LTP
  • Contributed ₹5.02 to New High Price (37.80% of total market NHP) through 15 trades
  • Alleged manipulative intent to set new high price through small quantity trades
Source bodySecurities & Exchange Board of India (SEBI) — enforcement orders
Reference numberOrder/JS/VC/2026-27/32459
Statusclosed (section: order)
Year2026
Closing date
Documents1

Highlights & Points worth asking

Auto-generated, neutral observations. Auto-generated from public documents. May contain errors. Not legal or financial advice. Always verify against the linked original document. KaunZimmedar is a platform, not an authority.

No automated observations for this document. Read the documents below directly.

Documents

The original government PDF is the authoritative source — shown below, or open it full-screen in a new tab.

Order 2026-06-30 ORDER_1782816402.pdf
Tap “Open the PDF” above to view this document.

Discussion (0)

Citizens discussing these documents. A discussion space — nothing here is verified fact or an official finding. Reading is free; sign in to take part.

Open discussion (0) →