Courts Supreme Court
Supreme Court strikes down Karnataka law validating corrupt 2011 civil service selection
The case concerns a challenge to the Karnataka Civil Services (Validation of Selection and Appointment of 2011 Batch Gazetted Probationers) Act, 2022, which sought to validate a 2011 recruitment process that had been previously cancelled…
The case concerns a challenge to the Karnataka Civil Services (Validation of Selection and Appointment of 2011 Batch Gazetted Probationers) Act, 2022, which sought to validate a 2011 recruitment process that had been previously cancelled due to corruption and nepotism. The core issue is whether the State Legislature can directly annul a judicial judgment that invalidated the selection process.
Who it concerns: Appellants: Srinivasa T. & Ors.; Respondents: The State of Karnataka and Ors.; Bench: Justice K. Vinod Chandran.
What the court decided
- The Court declared the Act of 2022 unconstitutional.
- The Court set aside the Act of 2022.
- The Court set aside the impugned judgments of the High Court in both the PIL and the Writ Petition.
- The Court allowed the Public Interest Litigation (PIL), transposing the appellants as petitioners.
- The Court held that the legislature cannot directly annul a final judgment by subsequent legislation.
Also in the document
- The Court noted that the 2011 recruitment was cancelled due to rampant corruption and blatant nepotism, which was upheld by the High Court and the Supreme Court in earlier proceedings.
- The Court expressed 'a little bit of surprise and a lot more alarm' regarding the High Court's earlier orders that upheld the 2022 Act.
- The Court cited the principle that while the legislature can amend laws retrospectively to remove defects, it cannot directly annul a final judgment affecting individual rights and liabilities.
How this was written
An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.
✓ Figures checked. Every number in this summary was found in the document by an automated check.
That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.
The original document
Supreme Court of India — orders & judgments
Court order · 29 Oct 2026
Read it here
Discussion
No one has discussed this document yet.