कौन ज़िम्मेदार? KaunZimmedar

NHIDCL requires ₹3.46 lakh e-bank guarantee for landslide monitoring bid

NHIDCL is inviting bids for the supply and installation of instruments and web-based monitoring for the PagalNallah Landslide site on NH-07 in Chamoli District, Uttarakhand.

Bidders must have an average annual turnover of Rs. 1.73 Cr during the last 3 years. They must also have completed work of similar nature in the last 5 years, meeting one of the following: a single work of Rs. 0.86 Cr, two similar works of Rs. 0.60 Cr each, or three similar works of Rs. 0.43 Cr each. Bidders must be registered on the e-procurement portal (eorocure.gov.in) with a valid registration at the time of bid submission.

  • Estimated Cost: Rs. 1.73 Cr (Excl. GST)
  • Bid Security: Rs. 3.46 Lakh (e-Bank Guarantee only)
  • Contract Duration: 12 Months
  • Bid Validity: 120 Days
  • Tender Type: e-tendering (Open)
  • Bid Submission Deadline: 15-09-2025 (15:00 Hrs.)
  • Bid Document Cost: Rs. 11,800 (Non-refundable)

Written from the document by AI, and checked against it. The original below is authoritative.

The original document

Notice 2025-08-25
Tap “Open the PDF” above to view this document.
Notice 2025-08-25
Notice 2025-08-25
Notice 2025-08-25
Corrigendum 1 2025-08-25 scanned
Tap “Open the PDF” above to view this document.
Corrigendum 2 2025-08-25 scanned
Tap “Open the PDF” above to view this document.
Corrigendum 3 2025-08-25 scanned
Tap “Open the PDF” above to view this document.
Corrigendum 4 2025-08-25 scanned
Tap “Open the PDF” above to view this document.
Document details
Official titleSupply & Installation of Instruments, Web Based Monitoring of PagalNallah Landslide site (Km 454+300) on NH-07 in Chamoli District in the state of Uttarakhand.
Source bodyNational Highways & Infrastructure Development Corporation (NHIDCL)
Reference number
Statusclosed (archive)
Year2025
Closing date15-09-2025
Documents8 · changed 4× after publishing
Observations & questions a citizen might ask

Factual observations drawn mechanically from the documents — not findings or allegations. Verify each against the original.

  • The department changed this document 4 times after first publishing it.
  • What prompted each amendment, and was the closing date extended to give bidders time to respond?
  • Do the eligibility and scope requirements match the stated purpose and estimated value?
  • Were all amendments published on the portal before the deadline?

📄 Draft an RTI to ask what the documents don't say

Discussion (0)

Citizens discussing these documents. A discussion space — nothing here is verified fact or an official finding. Reading is free; sign in to take part.

Open discussion (0) →