Courts Supreme Court
Supreme Court allows Chandigarh to revisit auction to maximise public property price
This case concerns a dispute over the cancellation of a bid contract and Agreement to Sell for a nursing home site in Chandigarh, where the Administration argued the bid did not reflect market trends.
The Supreme Court determined whether the public authority could revisit the auction to maximize the price of public property before a binding contract was fully concluded.
Who it concerns: Appellants: Satinder Pal Singh & Ors. (successful bidder in the re-auction) and Chandigarh Administration; Respondent: M/s Bedi Hospital & Ors. (original successful bidder). The judgment is reportable (2026 INSC 1142), but the specific bench composition (judges) is not stated in the provided text.
What the court decided
- Set aside the decision of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana.
- Directed the Chandigarh Administration to conduct a fresh e-auction for Site No. 4 within a period of three months.
- Granted leave to appeal.
Also in the document
- The Court noted that the Chandigarh Administration had already returned the entire bid amount to M/s Bedi Hospital following the initial cancellation.
- The Court observed that the adjacent site (Site No. 3) fetched Rs. 18.25 Crores, while the disputed site (Site No. 4) fetched only Rs. 12.58 Crores, creating a difference of Rs. 6 Crores.
- The Court referenced the Chandigarh Estate Rules, 2007, and General Terms and Conditions, which allow the Estate Officer to accept or reject bids or cancel auctions without assigning a reason.
How this was written
An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.
✓ Figures checked. Every number in this summary was found in the document by an automated check.
That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.
The original document
Supreme Court of India — orders & judgments
Court order · 23 Oct 2026
Read it here
Discussion
No one has discussed this document yet.