NHIDCL to widen 24 km and upgrade 27 km of NH-301 in Ladakh on EPC basis
NHIDCL is contracting for the widening and upgradation of NH-301 Kargil Zanskar Road to a 2-lane standard with paved shoulders in the Union Territory of Ladakh. The scope includes the balance work from km 6.000 to km 30.040 (24.040 km) and additional protection works from km 30.040 to km 57+000 (26.960 km) on an Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) basis.
The document invites bids from 'eligible contractors' but does not specify the detailed eligibility criteria such as minimum turnover, years of experience, or required certifications in the provided text. It mentions that Joint Bidding Agreements may be submitted, implying consortiums are permitted, but specific rules are not detailed here.
- Estimated Cost: Rs. 89.35 Cr (Excl. GST)
- Security Maintenance: Rs. 0.89 Cr
- Bid Submission Deadline: 06/10/2025 (upto 1500 Hrs. IST)
- Bid Opening Date: 07/10/2025 (at 1630 hours IST)
- Construction Period: 24 Months
- Maintenance Period: 60 Months (including non-working period)
- Tender Mode: Online via CPPP website (eprocure.gov.in)
Written from the document by AI, and checked against it. The original below is authoritative.
The original document
Document details
| Official title | Widening & Upgradation to 2-lane with paved shoulder of Balance Work of NH-301 Kargil Zanskar Road from Design km 6.000 to km 30.040 of 24.040 Km length in the Union Territory of Ladakh on EPC mode, including the Additional Protection Works for Widening & Upgradation to 2-lane with paved shoulder of NH-301 Kargil Zanskar Road from Design km 30.040 to km 57+000 of 26.960 Km length in the Union Territory of Ladakh on EPC mode. |
| Source body | National Highways & Infrastructure Development Corporation (NHIDCL) |
| Reference number | — |
| Status | closed (archive) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Closing date | 06-10-2025 |
| Documents | 9 · changed 2× after publishing |
Observations & questions a citizen might ask
Factual observations drawn mechanically from the documents — not findings or allegations. Verify each against the original.
- The department changed this document 2 times after first publishing it.
- What prompted each amendment, and was the closing date extended to give bidders time to respond?
- Do the eligibility and scope requirements match the stated purpose and estimated value?
- Were all amendments published on the portal before the deadline?