Saturday, 17 October 2026 कौन ज़िम्मेदार?
कौन ज़िम्मेदार?KaunZimmedar

Every story is a real government document.

Courts Supreme Court

Supreme Court: State cannot accept gift of temple land, only custodian

The case concerns whether the State Government of Tamil Nadu can accept a gift of temple land from a temporary trustee, with the core issue being if such alienation is valid under the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments…

The case concerns whether the State Government of Tamil Nadu can accept a gift of temple land from a temporary trustee, with the core issue being if such alienation is valid under the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and Charitable Endowments Act, 1959.

Who it concerns: Appellants: K. Ramalingam and others (devotees); Respondents: Government of Tamil Nadu (represented by its Secretary), the temporary trustee (S. Bhoopathy), and the hereditary trustee; Bench: Justice Alok Aradhe.

What the court decided

  • The Court granted leave to appeal.
  • The Court noted the State's affidavit admitting the land belongs to the Temple and that the Gift Deed cannot be sustained.
  • The Court observed that the State agreed to cancel the gift deed and take the land on lease/rent.
  • The Court noted that a fair lease rent of Rs. 13,235/- per month for three years was fixed by a committee.
  • The Court stated that the administration of religious property carries a duty of preservation, not unfettered disposition.

Also in the document

  • The judgment is marked as 'Reportable' (2026 INSC 1144).
  • The State filed an affidavit in 2022 admitting the land is 'INAM Land' belonging to the deity and agreeing to cancel the gift deed.
  • The High Court had previously dismissed the writ petition, holding that 'gift' is not explicitly prohibited in Section 34 of the 1959 Act.

How this was written

An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.

✓ Figures checked. Every number in this summary was found in the document by an automated check.

That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.

How we work · Report an error in this story

The original document

Supreme Court of India — orders & judgments

Court order · 17 Oct 2026

Order 17 Oct 2026 · 0.4 MB Open the document On livelaw.in ↗
Read it here

Discussion

Discuss the documents, not people. No doxxing of private individuals. Do not state allegations of crime or wrongdoing as fact — ask questions instead. Be civil. Posts that break these rules may be removed by moderators.

Sign in with Google to post

No one has discussed this document yet.