Thursday, 15 October 2026 कौन ज़िम्मेदार?
कौन ज़िम्मेदार?KaunZimmedar

Every story is a real government document.

Courts Supreme Court

Supreme Court deletes mandate for trial courts to collect death-penalty factors

This matter concerns an application by the National Legal Service Authority (NALSA) seeking clarification on a previous Supreme Court order that mandated trial courts to collect aggravating and mitigating factors in all cases punishable by…

This matter concerns an application by the National Legal Service Authority (NALSA) seeking clarification on a previous Supreme Court order that mandated trial courts to collect aggravating and mitigating factors in all cases punishable by death. The core issue was whether this mandatory direction was workable for trial courts.

Who it concerns: Petitioner/Applicant: National Legal Service Authority (NALSA); Respondent: The State of Bihar (in the underlying appeal Aman Singh & Anr. vs. The State of Bihar); Bench: Justices Vikram Nath, Sanjeev Mehta, and Apuresh Kumar Singh.

What the court decided

  • Deleted Paragraph 13(A) of the order dated 27th April, 2026, which mandated trial courts to call for reports on aggravating and mitigating circumstances.
  • Ordered the issuance of a corrigendum to reflect the deletion of Paragraph 13(A).
  • Directed that the corrected copy be forwarded to all concerned parties.
  • Disposed of Interim Application (IA) No. 276673/2026.

Also in the document

  • The Court agreed with NALSA's submission that the previous direction was not workable and could cause procedural difficulties due to lack of resources in trial courts.
  • The deletion specifically relieves trial courts from the mandatory requirement to undertake the exercise of collecting these reports in every case involving an offence punishable with death.

How this was written

An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.

✓ Figures checked. Every number in this summary was found in the document by an automated check.

That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.

How we work · Report an error in this story

The original document

Supreme Court of India — orders & judgments

Court order · Ref. Criminal Appeal Nos. 2351-52 of 2026 · 14 Oct 2026

Order 14 Oct 2026 · 0.1 MB Open the document On livelaw.in ↗
Read it here

Discussion

Discuss the documents, not people. No doxxing of private individuals. Do not state allegations of crime or wrongdoing as fact — ask questions instead. Be civil. Posts that break these rules may be removed by moderators.

Sign in with Google to post

No one has discussed this document yet.