NHIDCL bans joint ventures, allows only sole bidders for ₹4.09 crore Meghalaya road project
National Highways Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited (NHIDCL) is inviting bids for the construction of Gabion type Breast Walls at various locations on the Ranikor Moheshkhola Baghmara road (SH-04) in Meghalaya.
Bidders must be sole entities (Joint Ventures are not allowed). They must have an average annual turnover of at least Rs. 409.95 lac over the last 3 years. Additionally, they must have experience in highway/road construction or maintenance works of similar nature during the last 5 years, meeting one of the following criteria: a single similar work of at least Rs. 204.97 lac, two similar works each of at least Rs. 143.48 lac, or three similar works each of at least Rs. 102.49 lac. Bidders must also register on the e-procurement portal and provide a self-certification for Local Content requirements.
- Estimated Cost: Rs. 4,09,94,656/- (Inclusive of all taxes & excluding GST)
- Bid Security/EMD: Rs. 8.20 lacs
- Tender Type: Item Rate Contract via e-tendering
- Bid Submission Deadline: 12-01-2026 (17:00 Hrs)
- Bid Validity: 120 Days from the Bid Due Date
- Contract Duration: 03 Months (Construction) + 05 Years (Defect Liability Period)
Written from the document by AI, and checked against it. The original below is authoritative.
The original document
Document details
| Official title | Construction of Gabion type Breast Wall at different locations of Ranikor Moheshkhola Ba ghmara road (SH-04) from Km 30.000 (Nongjri) to Km 129.385 (Baghmara) in the State of Meghalaya in FY 2025-26. |
| Source body | National Highways & Infrastructure Development Corporation (NHIDCL) |
| Reference number | — |
| Status | closed (archive) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Closing date | 12-01-2026 |
| Documents | 3 · changed 1× after publishing |
Observations & questions a citizen might ask
Factual observations drawn mechanically from the documents — not findings or allegations. Verify each against the original.
- The department changed this document 1 time after first publishing it.
- What prompted each amendment, and was the closing date extended to give bidders time to respond?
- Do the eligibility and scope requirements match the stated purpose and estimated value?
- Were all amendments published on the portal before the deadline?