Markets Reserve Bank of India
RBI Bengaluru clarifies 135 staff minimum excludes relievers in facility tender
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI), Bengaluru Regional Office, is procuring Integrated Facility Management Services for its Main Office Premises and seven residential colonies in Bengaluru via a GeM bid.
Who can bid: The provided text does not state the specific eligibility criteria (such as minimum turnover, years of experience, or required certifications) for bidders. It only lists the names of eight prospective bidders who attended the pre-bid meeting.
Key terms
- Tender Type: GeM Bid (No. GEM/2026/B/8007021)
- Bid Date: September 7, 2026
- Pre-bid Meeting Date: October 5, 2026
- Service Area: 7 properties (MOP, RBOQ Cunningham Road, RBOQ Cunningham Crescent, RBOQ Koramangala, RBSQ Osborne Road, RBSQ RPC Layout, RBSQ Nandini Layout)
- Minimum Manpower: 135 (excluding relievers)
Also in the document
- The document clarifies that the 135 minimum manpower requirement does not include relievers, which bidders must factor into their costs.
- Bidders are required to submit a 'Service Area Visit Declaration' listing all seven properties with visit dates certified by the Caretaker, a format provided in the annexure.
- The RBI clarified that costs for cleaning materials, overtime, and statutory labor charges (PF, ESI, etc.) must be included in the quoted rates and will not be reimbursed separately.
How this was written
An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.
✓ Figures checked. Every number in this summary was found in the document by an automated check.
That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.
The original document
Reserve Bank of India (RBI)
Tender · Ref. 25955 · 12 Oct 2026
Read it here
Questions a citizen might ask
Observations drawn mechanically from the documents — not findings or allegations.
- The department changed this document 1 time after first publishing it.
- What prompted each amendment, and was the closing date extended to give bidders time to respond?
- Do the eligibility and scope requirements match the stated purpose and estimated value?
- Were all amendments published on the portal before the deadline?
Discussion
No one has discussed this document yet.