Thursday, 8 October 2026 कौन ज़िम्मेदार?
कौन ज़िम्मेदार?KaunZimmedar

Every story is a real government document.

Courts Supreme Court

Supreme Court rebukes Centre for ignoring disabled cadet welfare orders

This is a suo moto writ petition concerning the welfare and service benefits of military cadets who were outboarded due to disabilities.

The core issue is the non-compliance by the respondent Departments with the Court's previous direction to reconsider recommendations for these cadets.

Who it concerns: Petitioner: By Court's Motion (Suo Moto). Respondents: Central Government Departments (represented by ASG and Advocates). Bench: Hon'ble Mrs. Justice B.V. Nagarathna, Hon'ble Mr. Justice R. Mahadevan, and Hon'ble Mr. Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyaya.

What the court decided

  • The Court found non-compliance with its order dated 04.08.2026, which directed respondent Departments to reconsider Sabharwal Committee recommendations.
  • The Court granted one final opportunity to the respondent Departments to comply with the direction and place meeting minutes on record.
  • The matter was adjourned to 30.11.2026 at 02:00 PM.
  • The Amicus Curie was directed to identify benefits extended to outboarded recruits to consider parity for outboarded officer cadets at the next hearing.

Also in the document

  • The Court explicitly stated that there was 'no whisper' in the affidavit regarding the reconsideration of the Committee's report as directed.
  • The Court warned that it would be 'constrained to pass certain adverse orders' if the respondent Departments do not comply with the directions.
  • The grievance noted is that outboarded recruits receive service benefits, but outboarded officer cadets do not, despite seeking parity.

How this was written

An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.

✓ Figures checked. Every number in this summary was found in the document by an automated check.

That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.

How we work · Report an error in this story

The original document

Supreme Court of India — orders & judgments

Court order · 8 Oct 2026

Order 8 Oct 2026 · 0.1 MB Open the document On livelaw.in ↗
Read it here

Discussion

Discuss the documents, not people. No doxxing of private individuals. Do not state allegations of crime or wrongdoing as fact — ask questions instead. Be civil. Posts that break these rules may be removed by moderators.

Sign in with Google to post

No one has discussed this document yet.