NHIDCL to spend ₹157.81 crore on Tripura highway project
NHIDCL is inviting bids for the strengthening of the Udaipur–Sabroom section (km 55.000 to km 127.372) and raising/drainage works on selected stretches of the Agartala-Udaipur section of NH-08 in Tripura, to be executed on an Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) mode.
The document text provided does not contain the specific eligibility criteria, minimum turnover, years of experience, or required certifications. It references 'Cl. 2.2.2' for qualification requirements and mentions that bidders must provide 'Self Certification' for Local Content requirements and a 'Certificate regarding Compliance' with GFR Rule 144(xi), but the specific thresholds are not stated in this excerpt.
- Estimated Cost: Rs. 157.81 Crore (exclusive of GST)
- Completion Period: 18 months
- Maintenance Period: 60 months
- Bid Submission Deadline: 05.03.2026 (up to 1100 hours IST)
- Bid Opening Date: 05.03.2026 (at 1630 hours IST)
- Tender Type: EPC (Engineering, Procurement, and Construction)
- Bid Security: Not stated in the provided text (referenced in table of contents but amount not visible)
Written from the document by AI, and checked against it. The original below is authoritative.
The original document
Document details
| Official title | (i) Strengthening of Udaipur–Sabroom section from km 55.000 to km 127.372 of NH-08 and (ii) Raising and drainage provision in selected stretches of Agartala-Udaipur section of NH-08 in the State of Tripura on EPC mode. |
| Source body | National Highways & Infrastructure Development Corporation (NHIDCL) |
| Reference number | — |
| Status | closed (archive) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Closing date | 05-03-2026 |
| Documents | 7 · changed 1× after publishing |
Observations & questions a citizen might ask
Factual observations drawn mechanically from the documents — not findings or allegations. Verify each against the original.
- The department changed this document 1 time after first publishing it.
- What prompted each amendment, and was the closing date extended to give bidders time to respond?
- Do the eligibility and scope requirements match the stated purpose and estimated value?
- Were all amendments published on the portal before the deadline?