कौन ज़िम्मेदार? KaunZimmedar
BrowseNHIDCL › tender

(i) Strengthening of Udaipur–Sabroom section from km 55.000 to km 127.372 of NH-08 and (ii) Raising and drainage provision in selected stretches of Agartala-Udaipur section of NH-08 in the State of Tripura on EPC mode.

NHIDCL closed changed 1× 2026
Plain-language summary (AI-generated) — a quick read so you don't have to open the full PDF. May contain errors; the original document below is authoritative.

What is this tender for?

The Ministry of Road Transport & Highways, through National Highways & Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd. (NHIDCL), is contracting for the strengthening of a section of National Highway 08 (NH-08) from km 55.000 to km 127.372 between Udaipur and Sabroom, and raising and drainage work in selected stretches of the Agartala-Udaipur section of NH-08 in Tripura, on an EPC (Engineering, Procurement, Construction) basis.

Who can bid / win?

Bidders must meet eligibility requirements including financial capacity (certified by statutory auditor), technical capacity, and compliance with local content requirements for Class-I or Class-II Local Supplier. Specific thresholds for turnover, experience, or certifications are not stated in the document.

Key terms

  • Estimated project cost: Rs. 157.81 Crore (exclusive of GST)
  • Completion period: 60 months
  • Maintenance period: 18 months
  • Bid submission deadline: 05.03.2026 (up to 1100 hours IST)
  • Bid validity: Not stated
  • Contract duration: 60 months (construction) + 18 months (maintenance)
Source bodyNational Highways & Infrastructure Development Corporation (NHIDCL)
Reference number
Statusclosed (section: archive)
Year2026
Closing date05-03-2026
Documents7 · changed 1× after publishing

Highlights & Points worth asking

Auto-generated, neutral observations. Auto-generated from public documents. May contain errors. Not legal or financial advice. Always verify against the linked original document. KaunZimmedar is a platform, not an authority.

These are factual observations drawn mechanically from the documents below — not findings, opinions, or allegations of wrongdoing. Verify each against the linked original.

What we observed

  • The department changed this document 1 time after first publishing it.

Points a citizen might reasonably ask

  • What prompted each amendment, and was the closing date extended to give bidders time to respond?
  • Do the eligibility and scope requirements match the stated purpose and estimated value?
  • Were all amendments published on the portal before the deadline?
📄 Draft an RTI to ask what the documents don't say

Documents

The original government PDF is the authoritative source — shown below, or open it full-screen in a new tab.

Notice 2026-02-03 rfp_0.pdf
Tap “Open the PDF” above to view this document.
Notice 2026-02-03 DCA
Notice 2026-02-03 Schedules
Notice 2026-02-03 Drawings
Notice 2026-02-03 Modified RFP
Notice 2026-02-03 Technical Evaluation Result
Corrigendum 1 2026-02-03 scanned corrigendumletter.pdf
Tap “Open the PDF” above to view this document.

Discussion (0)

Citizens discussing these documents. A discussion space — nothing here is verified fact or an official finding. Reading is free; sign in to take part.

Open discussion (0) →