NHIDCL requires ₹14.72 lakh e-bank guarantee for Uttarakhand highway bid
NHIDCL is inviting bids for short-term maintenance and rehabilitation of a 100 km section of NH-7 (Old NH-58) in Uttarakhand, from Rudraprayag to Helang.
Bidders must have an average annual turnover of at least Rs. 7.36 Cr over the last 3 years. They must also have completed similar work in the last 5 years, meeting one of the following: a single work of Rs. 3.68 Cr, two works of Rs. 2.58 Cr each, or three works of Rs. 1.84 Cr each. Bidders must be registered on the e-procurement portal (eorocure.gov.in) with a valid user ID.
- Estimated Cost: Rs. 7.36 Cr (Excl. GST)
- Bid Security: Rs. 14.72 Lakhs (e-Bank Guarantee only)
- Contract Duration: 12 months
- Bid Validity: 120 days from submission deadline
- Tender Type: e-tendering (Open)
- Bid Document Cost: Rs. 11,800 (Non-refundable)
Written from the document by AI, and checked against it. The original below is authoritative.
The original document
Notice
2026-03-02
Corrigendum 1
2026-03-02
scanned
Tap “Open the PDF” above to view this document.
Corrigendum 2
2026-03-02
scanned
Tap “Open the PDF” above to view this document.
Corrigendum 3
2026-03-02
scanned
Tap “Open the PDF” above to view this document.
Corrigendum 4
2026-03-02
Tap “Open the PDF” above to view this document.
Corrigendum 5
2026-03-02
Tap “Open the PDF” above to view this document.
Document details
| Official title | Short Term Maintenance and Rehabilitation work of 2 lane +PS highway from Km. 368.000 to Km. 468.000 of Rudraprayag to Helang on NH-7 (Old NH-58) under M&R Head and at Risk & Cost of EPC Contractor in the State of Uttarakhand |
| Source body | National Highways & Infrastructure Development Corporation (NHIDCL) |
| Reference number | — |
| Status | closed (archive) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Closing date | 09-03-2026 |
| Documents | 7 · changed 5× after publishing |
Observations & questions a citizen might ask
Factual observations drawn mechanically from the documents — not findings or allegations. Verify each against the original.
- The department changed this document 5 times after first publishing it.
- What prompted each amendment, and was the closing date extended to give bidders time to respond?
- Do the eligibility and scope requirements match the stated purpose and estimated value?
- Were all amendments published on the portal before the deadline?