कौन ज़िम्मेदार? KaunZimmedar

NHIDCL requires ₹18.67 lakh e-Bank Guarantee for ₹9.34 crore Uttarakhand road maintenance bid

NHIDCL is inviting bids for short-term maintenance work on miscellaneous structures (Km. 368.000 to Km. 468.000) of NH-7 (old NH-58) in Uttarakhand, to be executed at the risk and cost of the EPC Contractor.

Bidders must have an average annual turnover of at least Rs. 9.34 Cr during the last 3 years. They must also have experience in similar work during the last 5 years, meeting one of the following: a single work of Rs. 4.67 Cr, two similar works of Rs. 3.27 Cr each, or three similar works of Rs. 2.33 Cr each. Bidders must register on the e-procurement portal (eorocure.gov.in) and submit bids online.

  • Estimated Cost: Rs. 9.34 Cr (Excl. GST)
  • Bid Security: Rs. 18.67 Lakhs (e-Bank Guarantee only)
  • Contract Duration: 6 months
  • Bid Validity: 120 days from bid due date
  • Bid Submission Deadline: 12-03-2026 (17:00 Hrs.)
  • Tender Type: e-tendering (Online)

Written from the document by AI, and checked against it. The original below is authoritative.

The original document

Notice 2026-03-05
Tap “Open the PDF” above to view this document.
Notice 2026-03-05
Notice 2026-03-05
Notice 2026-03-05
Corrigendum 1 2026-03-05 scanned
Tap “Open the PDF” above to view this document.
Corrigendum 2 2026-03-05 scanned
Tap “Open the PDF” above to view this document.
Document details
Official titleShort Term Maintenance work (Miscellaneous Structure works) from Km. 368.000 to Km. 468.000 of Rudraprayag to Helang on NH-7 (old NH-58) under M&R Head and at Risk & Cost of the EPC Contractor in the state of Uttarakhand
Source bodyNational Highways & Infrastructure Development Corporation (NHIDCL)
Reference number
Statusclosed (archive)
Year2026
Closing date12-03-2026
Documents6 · changed 2× after publishing
Observations & questions a citizen might ask

Factual observations drawn mechanically from the documents — not findings or allegations. Verify each against the original.

  • The department changed this document 2 times after first publishing it.
  • What prompted each amendment, and was the closing date extended to give bidders time to respond?
  • Do the eligibility and scope requirements match the stated purpose and estimated value?
  • Were all amendments published on the portal before the deadline?

📄 Draft an RTI to ask what the documents don't say

Discussion (0)

Citizens discussing these documents. A discussion space — nothing here is verified fact or an official finding. Reading is free; sign in to take part.

Open discussion (0) →