NHIDCL extends bid deadline to 16.04.2026 for ₹884.54 lakh Tripura highway repair
NHIDCL is inviting bids for restoration works, specifically erosion control and slope protection, on a 12 km section of NH-08 in Tripura (Mungiakami to Champaknagar) damaged by August 2024 floods. The work is to be executed on a percentage basis and work order basis based on an assessment by NIT Agartala.
Bidders must be sole entities (Joint Ventures are not allowed). They must have an average annual turnover of at least Rs. 884.54 Lakh during the last 5 years and experience in work of similar nature during the last 5 years. Bidders must be registered on the e-procurement portal (eorocure.gov.in) with a valid registration at the time of bid submission.
- Estimated Cost: Rs. 884.54 Lacs (inclusive of GST)
- Bid Security/EMD: Rs. 17.69 Lacs
- Contract Duration: 9 months
- Bid Validity: 120 days from the Bid Due Date
- Tender Type: Single Percentage Rate Bids via e-tendering
- Revised Bid Submission Deadline: 16.04.2026 (up to 1700 Hrs IST)
- Revised Bid Opening Date: 17.04.2026 (at 1705 Hrs IST)
Written from the document by AI, and checked against it. The original below is authoritative.
The original document
Document details
| Official title | Restoration works under “Specialized Repairs” through STMC for erosion control and slope protection at damaged stretches including landslips on various chainages on NH-08 section from Mungiakami to Champaknagar due to August 2024 floods, based on the assessment report of technical consultant NIT Agartala in the State of Tripura in the FY 2025-26 on percentage basis and work order basis. |
| Source body | National Highways & Infrastructure Development Corporation (NHIDCL) |
| Reference number | — |
| Status | closed (archive) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Closing date | 16-04-2026 |
| Documents | 4 · changed 1× after publishing |
Observations & questions a citizen might ask
Factual observations drawn mechanically from the documents — not findings or allegations. Verify each against the original.
- The department changed this document 1 time after first publishing it.
- What prompted each amendment, and was the closing date extended to give bidders time to respond?
- Do the eligibility and scope requirements match the stated purpose and estimated value?
- Were all amendments published on the portal before the deadline?