NHIDCL sets Rs 1.85 crore slope protection contract with Rs 3.71 lakh bid security
The National Highways and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd. (NHIDCL) is contracting for Hill Side Slope protection work at Kameda (386+550) along NH-07 in Uttarakhand, as part of a larger road construction and upgradation project.
Bidders must have a minimum average annual turnover of Rs. 0.92 crore (50% of the estimated work cost of Rs. 1.85 crore) from a single similar work, or Rs. 0.65 crore each from two similar works (35% of estimated cost), or Rs. 0.46 crore each from three similar works (25% of estimated cost) over the last 3 years. Bidders must be registered on the e-procurement portal (https://eorocure.gov.in/eprocure/app) with a valid registration until bid submission.
- Estimated contract value: Rs. 1.85 crore (Excl. GST)
- Bid security amount: Rs. 3,71,705
- Tender type: Open (e-tendering)
- Bid submission deadline: 27-04-2026
- Bid validity: 120 days from bid due date
- Contract duration: 3 months (Defect Liability Period)
Written from the document by AI, and checked against it. The original below is authoritative.
The original document
Document details
| Official title | Hill Side Slope protection work at Kameda (386+550) in the work of "Construction & Upgradation of existing road to 2-lane with paved shoulder from Km 368.000 to Km. 399.000 of Lameri to Karanprayag (Excluding Km 379.100 to Km 380.275) of NH-07 in the State of Uttarakhand" under Risk & Cost of the EPC contractor. |
| Source body | National Highways & Infrastructure Development Corporation (NHIDCL) |
| Reference number | — |
| Status | closed (archive) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Closing date | 30-04-2026 |
| Documents | 6 · changed 3× after publishing |
Observations & questions a citizen might ask
Factual observations drawn mechanically from the documents — not findings or allegations. Verify each against the original.
- The department changed this document 3 times after first publishing it.
- What prompted each amendment, and was the closing date extended to give bidders time to respond?
- Do the eligibility and scope requirements match the stated purpose and estimated value?
- Were all amendments published on the portal before the deadline?