कौन ज़िम्मेदार? KaunZimmedar

NHIDCL demands ₹49.90 lakh bid security for ₹49.89 crore highway maintenance contract

NHIDCL is inviting bids for a 60-month Performance Based Maintenance Contract (PBMC) for the operation and maintenance of the Rhenock-Rorathang-Pakyong section of National Highway 717A in Sikkim.

The document invites bids from 'experienced firms/organizations' but does not specify minimum turnover, years of experience, required certifications, or specific entity type requirements in the provided text.

  • Estimated Bid Cost: Rs. 49,89,47,727.89/-
  • Bid Security: Rs. 49,90,000.00/-
  • Bid Document Fee: Rs. 11,800/-
  • Contract Duration: 60 months
  • Tender Mode: e-tendering
  • Bid Due Date: 04.05.2026 (16:00 Hrs. IST)

Written from the document by AI, and checked against it. The original below is authoritative.

The original document

Notice 2026-04-04
Tap “Open the PDF” above to view this document.
Notice 2026-04-04
Corrigendum 1 2026-04-04 scanned
Tap “Open the PDF” above to view this document.
Corrigendum 2 2026-04-04 scanned
Tap “Open the PDF” above to view this document.
Document details
Official titlePerformance based Maintenance Contract (PBMC) work for the Rhenock - Rorathang - Pakyong section of National Highway 717A (Ch. 0+000 to Ch. 26+706) in the state of Sikkim.
Source bodyNational Highways & Infrastructure Development Corporation (NHIDCL)
Reference number
Statusclosed (archive)
Year2026
Closing date11-05-2026
Documents4 · changed 2× after publishing
Observations & questions a citizen might ask

Factual observations drawn mechanically from the documents — not findings or allegations. Verify each against the original.

  • The department changed this document 2 times after first publishing it.
  • What prompted each amendment, and was the closing date extended to give bidders time to respond?
  • Do the eligibility and scope requirements match the stated purpose and estimated value?
  • Were all amendments published on the portal before the deadline?

📄 Draft an RTI to ask what the documents don't say

Discussion (0)

Citizens discussing these documents. A discussion space — nothing here is verified fact or an official finding. Reading is free; sign in to take part.

Open discussion (0) →