Courts Courts & regulators
New mining law bars states from imposing new or retrospective mineral taxes
This document is a PIB Research overview of the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Amendment Bill, 2026, which has been passed by both houses of Parliament.
It matters to citizens because it establishes a uniform national framework for mineral taxation, restricting state governments from imposing new or retrospective levies on mineral rights and lands.
Who it concerns: The document concerns the Union Government (Central Government), State Governments, mining operators (including small and medium-scale miners), and the general public affected by mineral costs and supply chains.
What the document says
- The Bill restricts State governments from imposing any new taxes, cess, or levies on mineral rights or mineral-bearing lands unless conditions are prescribed by the Central Government.
- New Section 9D prohibits states from levying charges based on mineral quantity, value, royalty, or any other basis without central authorization.
- The Union Government is granted regulatory control over mineral-bearing lands, identified by parameters prescribed by the Central Government.
- Any levy not paid or collected by a State before the Amendment applies is treated as invalid, though amounts already recovered are not refundable.
- Section 13 of the MMDR Act is amended to empower the Central Government to make rules prescribing conditions for state levies.
Also in the document
- The document states that the Bill aims to address issues such as heavy tax burdens, unpredictable introduction of taxes, and non-uniform rates among states.
- It notes that retrospective imposition of taxes previously caused legal uncertainty and eroded investor trust.
- The document claims that excessive fiscal burdens previously discouraged mineral extraction and led to the closure of some mines.
- The text asserts that high and uneven levies pushed industries to avoid local supply chains, resulting in higher transport costs and pollution.
How this was written
An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.
✓ Figures checked. Every number in this summary was found in the document by an automated check.
That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.
The original document
Government documents surfaced by the press
Government document · Ref. aef28145772fe17b
Read it here
Discussion
No one has discussed this document yet.