Emergent Maintenance work of the existing road of the project “Construction of 4-Lane Bridge over Irang River on Imphal- Jiribam road section (95.500Km) NH-37 (Old NH-53) in the State of Manipur on EPC mode” at the Risk & Cost of the EPC Contractor” on Percentage Rate and work Order Basis (2nd Call)
What is this tender for?
The National Highways Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited (NHIDCL) is contracting for emergent maintenance work on an existing road section of the "Construction of 4-Lane Bridge over Irang River on Imphal-Jiribam road section (95.500Km) NH-37 (Old NH-53)" project in Manipur, to be performed at the risk and cost of the EPC Contractor, on a percentage rate and work order basis.
Who can bid / win?
Bidders must have an average annual turnover of at least Rs. 69.36 Lakh (excluding GST) over the last 3 years, or experience in completing at least one work of Rs. 34.68 Lakh (minimum 50% of estimated cost), or two works each of Rs. 24.276 Lakh (minimum 35% of estimated cost), or three works each of Rs. 17.34 Lakh (minimum 25% of estimated cost) of similar highway/road maintenance work in the last 5 years. Bidders must be registered on the e-procurement portal (https://eorocure.gov.in/eprocure/app) with a valid registration at the time of bid submission.
Key terms
- Estimated cost: Rs. 69,36,010.28 (exclusive of GST)
- EMD/security amount: Rs. 0.69360 Lakh
- Tender type: Open (single percentage rate)
- Bid submission deadline: 2026-07-04
- Bid validity: 120 days from bid due date
- Contract duration: 3 months
| Source body | National Highways & Infrastructure Development Corporation (NHIDCL) |
| Reference number | — |
| Status | closed (section: archive) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Closing date | 09-07-2026 |
| Documents | 4 · changed 2× after publishing |
Highlights & Points worth asking
These are factual observations drawn mechanically from the documents below — not findings, opinions, or allegations of wrongdoing. Verify each against the linked original.
What we observed
- The department changed this document 2 times after first publishing it.
Points a citizen might reasonably ask
- What prompted each amendment, and was the closing date extended to give bidders time to respond?
- Do the eligibility and scope requirements match the stated purpose and estimated value?
- Were all amendments published on the portal before the deadline?
Documents
The original government PDF is the authoritative source — shown below, or open it full-screen in a new tab.
Discussion (0)
Citizens discussing these documents. A discussion space — nothing here is verified fact or an official finding. Reading is free; sign in to take part.
Open discussion (0) →