Courts Supreme Court
Supreme Court orders ₹1 lakh compensation for daily-wage workers in Bihar dues case
This case concerns the resolution of three specific issues left open by the Supreme Court in a previous order regarding the payment of dues to employees of five state-owned corporations in Bihar and Jharkhand following the state's…
This case concerns the resolution of three specific issues left open by the Supreme Court in a previous order regarding the payment of dues to employees of five state-owned corporations in Bihar and Jharkhand following the state's reorganization. The core issues involve the verification of untraced employees, the entitlement of daily-wage workers to compensation, and the calculation of interest on delayed payments.
Who it concerns: Petitioners: Bihar State Ardha Sarkari Arjpati Karamchari Maha Sangh and others; Respondents: State of Bihar and others; Bench: Justice Mehta.
What the court decided
- The Court noted the compliance affidavits filed by the States of Bihar and Jharkhand regarding the disbursement of principal dues.
- The Court directed the States to take all necessary steps to complete the implementation of previous directions at the earliest.
- The Court identified three specific issues for determination: (i) identification/verification of remaining employees, (ii) entitlement of daily-wage workmen to compensation, and (iii) entitlement to interest on delayed payments.
- The document text provided ends before the Court's final operative orders or specific compensation amounts are detailed in the 'Conclusion and Directions' section.
Also in the document
- The case arises from the reorganization of the erstwhile State of Bihar pursuant to the Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000.
- The Court previously accepted recommendations from a Committee chaired by Retd. Justice Dinesh Maheshwari in an order dated 29th May, 2026.
- Compliance affidavits indicate that while substantial compliance has been reported, some claims remain pending due to untraceable claimants or missing documentation.
How this was written
An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.
✓ Figures checked. Every number in this summary was found in the document by an automated check.
That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.
The original document
Supreme Court of India — orders & judgments
Court order · 28 Sep 2026
Read it here
Discussion
No one has discussed this document yet.