NHIDCL to spend ₹13.35 crore on 21.10 km road upgrade in West Bengal
The National Highways and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd. (NHIDCL) is contracting for the construction and upgradation of a 21.10 km section of National Highway 717A from Kafer to Lava in West Bengal, including geometric improvements, to convert it to a 2-lane road with paved shoulders, during the fiscal year 2026-2027 (Package-VA) on a percentage rate basis.
Bidders must have an average annual turnover of at least Rs. 13.35 crore over the last 3 years, or have completed at least one single work of Rs. 6.68 crore (minimum 50% of the estimated cost), or two similar works each of Rs. 4.67 crore (minimum 35% of the estimated cost), or three similar works each of Rs. 3.34 crore (minimum 25% of the estimated cost) in the last 5 years.
- Estimated cost: Rs. 13,34,87,922/- (exclusive of GST)
- Security amount: Rs. 26,69,000/-
- Bid submission deadline: 06.07.2026
- Bid validity: 120 days
- Contract duration: 12 months (DLP)
- Tender type: Open (e-tendering)
Written from the document by AI, and checked against it. The original below is authoritative.
The original document
Document details
| Official title | Balance work under Risk and Cost for Construction and Upgradation of Existing Road to 2- Lane with Paved shoulders including geometric improvement of section from Kafer to Lava more km 40.00 to km 61.100 of NH-717A in the state of West Bengal during the FY 2026-2027 (Package-VA) on percentage rate basis |
| Source body | National Highways & Infrastructure Development Corporation (NHIDCL) |
| Reference number | 2026_NHIDC_909872_1 |
| Status | closed (current) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Closing date | 15-09-2026 17:00:00 |
| Documents | 7 · changed 6× after publishing |
Observations & questions a citizen might ask
Factual observations drawn mechanically from the documents — not findings or allegations. Verify each against the original.
- The department changed this document 6 times after first publishing it.
- What prompted each amendment, and was the closing date extended to give bidders time to respond?
- Do the eligibility and scope requirements match the stated purpose and estimated value?
- Were all amendments published on the portal before the deadline?