कौन ज़िम्मेदार? KaunZimmedar

CISF to secure private industries and joint ventures on cost-reimbursement basis

This Bill amends the Central Industrial Security Force Act, 1968 to allow the CISF to provide security to private industrial undertakings and joint ventures, and to deploy personnel outside India. It also updates administrative provisions regarding officer ranks and notice periods for withdrawal.

The Central Industrial Security Force (CISF), the Central Government, private industrial undertakings, joint ventures, and public sector undertakings.

  • Defines 'joint venture' as a venture jointly undertaken by the Central or State Government with a private industrial undertaking.
  • Defines 'private industrial undertaking' as an industry owned, controlled, or managed by a person other than the Central or State Government or any public sector industrial undertaking.
  • Allows the Central Government to appoint a Director-General and other supervisory officers using generic terms instead of specific ranks.
  • Extends the scope of CISF duties to include safeguarding joint ventures and private industrial undertakings.
  • Permits the deployment of CISF for duties within and outside India.
  • Increases the notice period required for the withdrawal of CISF from a public sector undertaking from one month to three months.

Written from the document by AI, and checked against it. The original below is authoritative.

Where this law is now — Became law (Act)

The original document

Bill 2008-12-18
Tap “Open the PDF” above to view this document.
Bill passed rs 2009-02-19
Tap “Open the PDF” above to view this document.
Document details
Official titleThe Central Industrial Security Force (Amendment) Bill, 2008
Source bodyParliament of India — Bills (Lok Sabha & Rajya Sabha)
Reference numberLXXI
Statusclosed (bill)
Year2008
Closing date
Documents2

Discussion (0)

Citizens discussing these documents. A discussion space — nothing here is verified fact or an official finding. Reading is free; sign in to take part.

Open discussion (0) →