कौन ज़िम्मेदार? KaunZimmedar

Supreme Court grants leave to appeal in juvenile age dispute, bail interim

The case concerns an appellant convicted of causing disappearance of evidence who claims he was a juvenile at the time of the offense, seeking to overturn a final conviction that the High Court refused to reopen under its inherent powers.

Appellant: Mahavir alias Avnish; Respondent: State of Madhya Pradesh; Bench: Justice Chandrashekar.

  • Leave granted for the Criminal Appeal.
  • The Court noted that the Juvenile Justice Board (JJ Board) had previously found the appellant was a juvenile on the date of the offense.
  • The Court expressed its inclination to entertain the petition based on prior judgments regarding juvenility claims.
  • Notice was issued to the respondent, returnable within six weeks.
  • The respondent was directed to file a counter-affidavit within four weeks.
  • The appellant was ordered to be released on bail on terms and conditions imposed by the trial court.

Written from the document by AI, and checked against it. The original below is authoritative.

The original document

Order 2026-09-06
Tap “Open the PDF” above to view this document.
Document details
Official titleFirst-Time Juvenility Claims Before SC Show 'Huge Gap' In JJ Act Implementation By Police, Trial Courts : Supreme Court
Source bodySupreme Court of India — orders & judgments
Reference number
Statusclosed (order)
Year2026
Closing date
Documents1

Discussion (0)

Citizens discussing these documents. A discussion space — nothing here is verified fact or an official finding. Reading is free; sign in to take part.

Open discussion (0) →