Markets Securities & Exchange Board
SEBI finds 6 non-genuine trades creating 2,58,000 unit artificial volume
This order addresses SEBI's investigation into Aastha Ruia Beneficial Trust for executing non-genuine trades in illiquid stock options on the BSE, which created artificial trading volume.
SEBI examined whether these actions violated regulations prohibiting fraudulent and unfair trade practices.
Who it concerns: Aastha Ruia Beneficial Trust (PAN: AAETA4128P), represented by Vineet Ruia.
What SEBI found or ordered
- SEBI found that the Noticee executed 6 non-genuine trades in 3 stock option contracts, resulting in an artificial volume of 2,58,000 units.
- SEBI alleged violations of Regulations 3(a), (b), (c), (d), 4(1), and 4(2)(a) of the SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices Relating to Securities Market) Regulations, 2003.
- The Noticee was offered three settlement schemes (2020, 2022, and 2024) but did not avail any of them.
- The Noticee appeared for a hearing on July 02, 2026, and submitted that they had no records of the transactions and suggested the broker might be responsible.
- SEBI noted that the Noticee's claim of delay in proceedings was meritless, citing that no specific timeline is prescribed in the SEBI Act for identifying non-genuine trades.
Also in the document
- The investigation covered a period from April 1, 2014, to September 30, 2015, during which 2,91,744 trades (81.41% of all BSE stock option trades) were allegedly non-genuine.
- The Noticee explicitly stated in submissions that they did not have records of the transactions and relied on SEBI's assertions.
- The order notes that the Noticee's accounts have been frozen for several years, a point raised by the Noticee in their submissions.
How this was written
An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.
✓ Figures checked. Every number in this summary was found in the document by an automated check.
That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.
The original document
Securities & Exchange Board of India (SEBI) — enforcement orders
Regulatory order · Ref. Order/MS/RG/2026-27/32706 · 3 Sep 2026
Read it here
Discussion
No one has discussed this document yet.