Saturday, 7 November 2026 कौन ज़िम्मेदार?
कौन ज़िम्मेदार?KaunZimmedar

Every story is a real government document.

Courts Central Information Commission

Chhattisgarh High Court rules inquiry records for self-defense must be disclosed if no third-party…

This digest summarizes six Right to Information (RTI) rulings from September 2026 issued by various High Courts and the Central Information Commission.

It covers questions regarding the disclosure of inquiry records, government service details, CCTV footage, and academic answer scripts, as well as the imposition of penalties and fees.

Who it concerns: The rulings concern public authorities including the Chhattisgarh High Court, Uttarakhand High Court, Allahabad High Court, Gujarat High Court, and the Central Information Commission (CIC). The applicants involved include individuals seeking records for self-defense, a husband seeking information on his estranged wife's government service, an RTI applicant seeking CCTV footage, an information seeker requesting third-party assistance in inspecting documents, and a student seeking answer scripts from a university.

What was ruled

  • Denial of inquiry records under Sections 8(1)(c) and 8(1)(j) is impermissible if no third-party privacy is involved.
  • Denial of information regarding an estranged spouse's government service is upheld if privacy outweighs other material.
  • Imposition of penalty under Section 20 requires a categorical finding that information was withheld mala fide.
  • CCTV footage covered by Section 8(1)(g) cannot be supplied directly to the applicant; they must approach a court or commission.
  • It is impermissible for an information seeker to use third parties to inspect documents under the RTI Act.
  • Universities cannot levy internal fees for providing copies of answer scripts sought under the RTI Act.

Also in the document

  • The Chhattisgarh High Court ruled that inquiry records sought for self-defense cannot be denied if no third-party privacy is involved.
  • The Uttarakhand High Court upheld the denial of RTI information concerning an estranged wife's government service.
  • The Allahabad High Court held that CCTV footage covered by Section 8(1)(g) cannot be supplied directly to the applicant.
  • The Central Information Commission held that a university cannot impose internal fees for providing answer scripts to a student.

How this was written

An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.

✓ Figures checked. Every number in this summary was found in the document by an automated check.

That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.

How we work · Report an error in this story

The original document

Right to Information — CIC & court rulings

RTI ruling · Ref. rti-2026-09 · 1 Sep 2026

RTI ruling 1 Sep 2026 On livelaw.in ↗

Discussion

Discuss the documents, not people. No doxxing of private individuals. Do not state allegations of crime or wrongdoing as fact — ask questions instead. Be civil. Posts that break these rules may be removed by moderators.

Sign in with Google to post

No one has discussed this document yet.