कौन ज़िम्मेदार? KaunZimmedar

Delhi High Court rules 'private use' not AI safe harbour in copyright case

This is a judgment by the High Court of Delhi (Justice Amit Bansal) in a copyright suit filed by ANI Media Pvt. Ltd. against Open AI, addressing whether using copyrighted news data to train AI models constitutes infringement and whether it qualifies as 'fair use' under Indian law. It matters to citizens as it establishes legal boundaries for AI training on copyrighted content in India.

ANI Media Pvt. Ltd. (Plaintiff), Open AI (Defendant), and various intervenors including the Federation of Indian Publishers, Broadband India Forum, and Flux AI Labs.

  • The court examined whether Open AI's use of ANI's copyrighted data for training its LLM (ChatGPT) amounts to copyright infringement under the Copyright Act, 1957.
  • The court analyzed whether the use qualifies as 'fair use' under Section 52(1)(a) of the Copyright Act, specifically considering 'private or personal use, including research'.
  • The court assessed whether ChatGPT's responses constitute a substantial reproduction of ANI's copyrighted literary works.
  • The court determined its territorial jurisdiction to entertain the suit despite the defendant's servers being located in the United States.

Written from the document by AI, and checked against it. The original below is authoritative.

The original document

Government document
Tap “Open the PDF” above to view this document.
Document details
Official titleHas “private use” become an AI safe harbour?
Source bodyGovernment documents surfaced by the press
Reference numberc1ad53f63d945350
Statusclosed (hc_judgment)
Year
Closing date
Documents1

Discussion (0)

Citizens discussing these documents. A discussion space — nothing here is verified fact or an official finding. Reading is free; sign in to take part.

Open discussion (0) →