Sunday, 8 November 2026 कौन ज़िम्मेदार?
कौन ज़िम्मेदार?KaunZimmedar

Every story is a real government document.

Courts Supreme Court

Supreme Court to decide if police can investigate PCPNDT Act offences

This case concerns a criminal appeal regarding the interpretation of the Pre-conception and Prenatal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994, specifically whether police are permitted to register FIRs and conduct…

This case concerns a criminal appeal regarding the interpretation of the Pre-conception and Prenatal Diagnostic Techniques (Prohibition of Sex Selection) Act, 1994, specifically whether police are permitted to register FIRs and conduct investigations for offences under the Act, or if such powers are exclusively reserved for the Appropriate Authority.

Who it concerns: The matter involves the State of Uttar Pradesh and another as Appellants versus Brij Pal Singh and another as Respondents. The judgment is authored by Justice Sanjay Karol.

What the court decided

  • The Court is addressing three specific questions framed by the Allahabad High Court: (1) whether FIR registration is permissible for PCPNDT Act offences; (2) whether police investigation is permissible and who can investigate; and (3) whether a Magistrate can take cognizance of a police chargesheet.
  • The appeal arises from a quashing petition under Section 482 CrPC which was accepted by the Single Judge, who then issued a certificate for appeal due to conflicting High Court views on the role of police in PCPNDT Act investigations.

Also in the document

  • The document notes a difference of opinion among various High Courts (Allahabad, Delhi, Punjab & Haryana, Madras) on whether police can register FIRs and investigate PCPNDT Act offences.
  • The case is marked as 'REPORTABLE' and is cited as 2026 INSC 901.

How this was written

An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.

⚠ Figures not confirmed. Our automated check could not find every number in this summary in the document. Treat the figures with care and check the original.

That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.

This document is in our archive but is not shown on our front pages: a number in the summary could not be found in the document.

How we work · Report an error in this story

The original document

Supreme Court of India — orders & judgments

Court order · Ref. Diary No. 22340/2025, Pre-Conception and Pre-Natal Diagnostic Techniques Act, PC & PNDT · 20 Aug 2026

Order 20 Aug 2026 · 1.5 MB Open the document On livelaw.in ↗
Read it here

Discussion

Discuss the documents, not people. No doxxing of private individuals. Do not state allegations of crime or wrongdoing as fact — ask questions instead. Be civil. Posts that break these rules may be removed by moderators.

Sign in with Google to post

No one has discussed this document yet.