Saturday, 7 November 2026 कौन ज़िम्मेदार?
कौन ज़िम्मेदार?KaunZimmedar

Every story is a real government document.

Markets Securities & Exchange Board

SEBI finds 81.40% of BSE stock options trades non-genuine

This order addresses SEBI's findings that Fatmabibi Yusufbhai Rangwala executed non-genuine reversal trades in illiquid stock options on the BSE, creating artificial volume.

The Adjudicating Officer proceeded ex-parte because the Noticee failed to respond to notices or appear for hearings.

Who it concerns: Fatmabibi Yusufbhai Rangwala (PAN: ASUPR4609Q)

What SEBI found or ordered

  • SEBI found that the Noticee executed 2 non-genuine trades in 1 stock options contract, resulting in an artificial volume of 1,40,000 units.
  • The trades were alleged to violate Regulations 3(a), (b), (c), (d), 4(1), and 4(2)(a) of the SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices Relating to Securities Market) Regulations, 2003.
  • The matter was decided ex-parte under Rule 4(7) of the SEBI Adjudication Rules because the Noticee did not file a reply to the Show Cause Notice or avail the opportunity for a personal hearing despite multiple notices.
  • The order notes that the Noticee did not avail the SEBI ISO Settlement Schemes of 2022 or 2024.

Also in the document

  • The investigation covered a broader period from April 1, 2014, to September 30, 2015, during which SEBI observed that 81.40% of all trades in the BSE stock options segment were allegedly non-genuine.
  • The total number of entities involved in the broader investigation was 14,720, but this specific order concerns only the individual Noticee.
  • The Adjudicating Officer relied on Supreme Court and SAT precedents to presume that the charges were admitted due to the Noticee's non-appearance.

How this was written

An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.

✓ Figures checked. Every number in this summary was found in the document by an automated check.

That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.

How we work · Report an error in this story

The original document

Securities & Exchange Board of India (SEBI) — enforcement orders

Regulatory order · Ref. Order/MS/SM/2026-27/32664 · 14 Aug 2026

Order 14 Aug 2026 · 0.5 MB Open the document On sebi.gov.in ↗
Read it here

Discussion

Discuss the documents, not people. No doxxing of private individuals. Do not state allegations of crime or wrongdoing as fact — ask questions instead. Be civil. Posts that break these rules may be removed by moderators.

Sign in with Google to post

No one has discussed this document yet.