RBI tender requires ITPQA experience from August 20, 2021, to August 20, 2026
The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) is procuring Independent Third-Party Quality Audit (ITPQA) services for the construction of additional staff quarters in Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh. The project is being executed on a 'Deposit Work' basis through the Central Public Works Department (CPWD) as the Project Management Consultant.
Bidders must have successfully provided or completed third-party quality audit (TPQA) services before August 20, 2021. Additionally, bidders must have completed similar TPQA contracts costing equal to or more than the minimum value specified in the pre-qualification criteria during the last 5 years ending on August 20, 2026 (i.e., from August 20, 2021). Specific monetary thresholds for turnover or contract value are not stated in this document text.
- Tender Type: E-Tender (No. 2026_RBI_286742_1) via CPP portal
- Project Duration: 24 months (extendable with pro-rata payment)
- Contractor Value (Reference): ₹102.98 Crore (for the construction work being audited)
- Security: 5% Security Deposit and 5% Performance Bank Guarantee (PBG) required
- Audit Frequency: Inspections/audits at intervals not exceeding one month
- Pre-Bid Meeting Date: August 13, 2026
Written from the document by AI, and checked against it. The original below is authoritative.
The original document
Document details
| Official title | Minutes of the Pre-Bid Meeting - Independent Third-Party Quality Audit (ITPQA) Services for ‘Construction of additional Quarters for Staff / Officers of RBI at Char Imli, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, including demolition of the distressed D type blocks’, taken up on ‘Deposit Work’ basis through the Central Public Works Department (CPWD) as Project Management Consultant |
| Source body | Reserve Bank of India (RBI) |
| Reference number | 25677 |
| Status | None (current) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Closing date | 2026-08-20 |
| Documents | 2 · changed 1× after publishing |
Observations & questions a citizen might ask
Factual observations drawn mechanically from the documents — not findings or allegations. Verify each against the original.
- The department changed this document 1 time after first publishing it.
- What prompted each amendment, and was the closing date extended to give bidders time to respond?
- Do the eligibility and scope requirements match the stated purpose and estimated value?
- Were all amendments published on the portal before the deadline?