Markets Securities & Exchange Board
SEBI finds 81.40% of BSE stock options trades non-genuine in 2014-2015 case
This order addresses alleged manipulative trading by Ram Asava HUF in the stock options segment of the Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) between April 2014 and September 2015.
SEBI examined whether these trades created artificial volume and violated regulations against fraudulent and unfair trade practices.
Who it concerns: Ram Asava HUF (PAN: AARHR3709J)
What SEBI found or ordered
- SEBI found that the Noticee executed 4 non-genuine trades in 2 stock options contracts, resulting in an artificial volume of 1,50,000 units.
- SEBI alleged violations of Regulations 3(a), (b), (c), (d), 4(1), and 4(2)(a) of the SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trade Practices Relating to Securities Market) Regulations, 2003.
- The proceedings were conducted ex-parte because the Noticee did not reply to the Show Cause Notice or appear for hearings despite multiple opportunities.
- The order notes that the Noticee did not avail of the SEBI ISO Settlement Schemes of 2022 or 2024.
Also in the document
- The investigation period covered a large scale of activity, with SEBI observing that 81.40% of all trades in the BSE stock options segment during the period were allegedly non-genuine.
- The case involves a significant delay between the investigation period (2014-2015) and the adjudication order (2026), with SEBI citing Supreme Court precedents to justify the timeline.
How this was written
An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.
✓ Figures checked. Every number in this summary was found in the document by an automated check.
That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.
The original document
Securities & Exchange Board of India (SEBI) — enforcement orders
Regulatory order · Ref. Order/MS/SM/2026-27/32662 · 13 Aug 2026
Read it here
Discussion
No one has discussed this document yet.