कौन ज़िम्मेदार? KaunZimmedar

Supreme Court acknowledges 1.1 billion enrolled in Aadhaar scheme

This is a Supreme Court of India judgment (Writ Petition (Civil) No. 494 of 2012 & connected matters) addressing constitutional challenges to the Aadhaar scheme and the Aadhaar Act, 2016. It matters to citizens because it determines the legal validity of the national identity system and its impact on the fundamental right to privacy.

The judgment concerns the Petitioners (Justice K.S. Puttaswamy (Retd.) and Mr. Pravesh Khanna), the Respondents (Union of India and others), the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI), and the general public enrolled in the Aadhaar scheme (approximately 1.1 billion people).

  • The case challenges the Aadhaar scheme, which was conceptualized in 2006, launched in 2009, and later given statutory cover by the Aadhaar (Targeted Delivery of Financial and Other Subsidies, Benefits and Services) Act, 2016.
  • The petitioners argue that the Aadhaar project violates the fundamental right to privacy under Article 21 of the Constitution of India and creates a surveillance state.
  • The Court notes that the scheme was initially implemented via administrative action before the 2016 Act was passed.
  • The judgment is delivered by Justice A.K. Sikri on behalf of the Chief Justice and Justice A.M. Khanwilkar.
  • The Court states it will examine the issues objectively on the touchstone of constitutional provisions, noting it was not influenced by external views from international bodies or public debate.

Written from the document by AI, and checked against it. The original below is authoritative.

The original document

Government document
Tap “Open the PDF” above to view this document.
Document details
Official titleWhen Seeing Becomes Recording: Invisible Bystander And Limits Of Indian Privacy Law
Source bodyGovernment documents surfaced by the press
Reference numberc184e829d7034fb2
Statusclosed (sc_judgment)
Year
Closing date
Documents1

Discussion (0)

Citizens discussing these documents. A discussion space — nothing here is verified fact or an official finding. Reading is free; sign in to take part.

Open discussion (0) →