NHIDCL to spend ₹11.8 crore on 12.6 km road upgrade in West Bengal
The National Highways and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd. (NHIDCL) is contracting the construction and upgradation of a 12.60 km section of NH-717A in West Bengal from Bagrakot to Kafer (km 13.00 to 25.600) to a 2-lane road with paved shoulders, including geometric improvements, on a percentage rate basis for FY 2026-2027.
Bidders must have an average annual turnover of at least Rs. 11.81 crore over the last 3 years, and must have completed at least one work of Rs. 5.91 crore (minimum 50% of the estimated cost) or two works of Rs. 4.14 crore each (minimum 35% each) or three works of Rs. 2.95 crore each (minimum 25% each) of similar nature in the last 5 years. Bidders must be registered on the e-procurement portal (eprocure.gov.in) with a valid registration at the time of bid submission.
- Estimated cost: Rs. 11,80,74,521/- (excl. GST)
- Bid security: Rs. 23,61,000/-
- Bid submission deadline: 06.07.2026 (17:00 Hrs)
- Bid validity: 120 days
- Contract duration: 12 months (construction period) + 12 months (DLP)
Written from the document by AI, and checked against it. The original below is authoritative.
The original document
Document details
| Official title | Balance work under Risk and Cost for Construction and upgradation of Existing Road to 2- Lane with Paved Shoulders including geometric improvement of section from start of Bagrakot to Kafer km 13.00 to km 25.600 (Package- IVB) of NH-717A in the state of West Bengal during the FY 2026-2027 on percentage rate basis |
| Source body | National Highways & Infrastructure Development Corporation (NHIDCL) |
| Reference number | — |
| Status | closed (archive) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Closing date | 17-07-2026 |
| Documents | 2 · changed 1× after publishing |
Observations & questions a citizen might ask
Factual observations drawn mechanically from the documents — not findings or allegations. Verify each against the original.
- The department changed this document 1 time after first publishing it.
- What prompted each amendment, and was the closing date extended to give bidders time to respond?
- Do the eligibility and scope requirements match the stated purpose and estimated value?
- Were all amendments published on the portal before the deadline?