कौन ज़िम्मेदार? KaunZimmedar

NHIDCL sets ₹26.69 lakh EMD for 21.10 km NH-717A upgrade

NHIDCL is inviting bids for the balance work of constructing and upgrading a 21.10 km section of NH-717A in West Bengal (km 40.00 to km 61.100) to a 2-lane road with paved shoulders and geometric improvements.

Bidders must have an average annual turnover of Rs. 13.35 Cr during the last 3 years. They must also have completed work of similar nature during the last 5 years, meeting one of the following: a single work of Rs. 6.68 Cr, two similar works of Rs. 4.67 Cr each, or three similar works of Rs. 3.34 Cr each. Bidders must be registered on the e-procurement portal (eprocure.gov.in) with a valid registration at the time of bid submission.

  • Estimated Cost: Rs. 13,34,87,922/- (excl. GST)
  • Bid Security/EMD: Rs. 26,69,000/-
  • Tender Type: Open e-tendering
  • Bid Submission Deadline: 06.07.2026 (Online: 17:00 Hrs, Hard Copy: 15:00 Hrs)
  • Bid Validity: 120 days
  • Contract Duration: 12 Months
  • Bid Document Cost: Rs. 11,800/- (Non-Refundable)

Written from the document by AI, and checked against it. The original below is authoritative.

The original document

Notice
Tap “Open the PDF” above to view this document.
Corrigendum 1 scanned
Corrigendum 2 scanned
Corrigendum 3 scanned
Tap “Open the PDF” above to view this document.
Corrigendum 4 scanned
Tap “Open the PDF” above to view this document.
Corrigendum 5 scanned
Tap “Open the PDF” above to view this document.
Document details
Official titleBalance work under Risk and Cost for Construction and Upgradation of Existing Road to 2- Lane with Paved shoulders including geometric improvement of section from Kafer to Lava more km 40.00 to km 61.100 of NH-717A in the state of West Bengal during the FY 2026-2027 (Package-VA) on percentage rate basis
Source bodyNational Highways & Infrastructure Development Corporation (NHIDCL)
Reference number
Statusclosed (current)
Year2026
Closing date15-09-2026 17:00:00
Documents6 · changed 5× after publishing
Observations & questions a citizen might ask

Factual observations drawn mechanically from the documents — not findings or allegations. Verify each against the original.

  • The department changed this document 5 times after first publishing it.
  • What prompted each amendment, and was the closing date extended to give bidders time to respond?
  • Do the eligibility and scope requirements match the stated purpose and estimated value?
  • Were all amendments published on the portal before the deadline?

📄 Draft an RTI to ask what the documents don't say

Discussion (0)

Citizens discussing these documents. A discussion space — nothing here is verified fact or an official finding. Reading is free; sign in to take part.

Open discussion (0) →