NHIDCL to spend ₹2,206.55 crore on 31.035 km highway package
The National Highways & Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited (NHIDCL) is contracting a private entity to develop, maintain, manage, and operate a 31.035 km greenfield high-speed corridor from Km 133+320 to Km 164+355 (Package-4) on a Hybrid Annuity Basis, connecting Mawlyngkhung near Shillong in Meghalaya to Panchgram near Silchar in Assam with 4-laning and paved shoulders.
Not stated in the document
- Estimated Project Cost (Excluding GST): Rs 2,206.55 Cr
- Estimated Bid Cost (Excluding GST): Rs 2,311.50 Cr
- Bid Submission Deadline: 13.04.2026 (up to 1100 Hrs. IST)
- Bid Security: To be submitted physically within 5-working days of Bid Due Date
- Technical Bid Opening: 14.04.2026 (at 1500 hours IST)
Written from the document by AI, and checked against it. The original below is authoritative.
The original document
Notice
2026-02-25
Corrigendum 1
2026-02-25
scanned
Corrigendum 2
2026-02-25
scanned
Corrigendum 3
2026-02-25
scanned
Corrigendum 4
2026-02-25
scanned
Corrigendum 5
2026-02-25
scanned
Corrigendum 6
2026-02-25
scanned
Corrigendum 7
2026-02-25
scanned
Corrigendum 8
2026-02-25
scanned
Document details
| Official title | Development, Maintenance, Management and Operation of Greenfield High-Speed Corridor from Mawlyngkhung (Near Shillong) in Meghalaya to Panchgram (Near Silchar) in Assam by 4-Laning with Paved Shoulders on Hybrid Annuity Basis. (Package-4: From Km 133+320 to Km 164+355, Design Length – 31.035 Km) |
| Source body | National Highways & Infrastructure Development Corporation (NHIDCL) |
| Reference number | — |
| Status | closed (current) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Closing date | 20-08-2026 15:00:00 |
| Documents | 9 · changed 8× after publishing |
Observations & questions a citizen might ask
Factual observations drawn mechanically from the documents — not findings or allegations. Verify each against the original.
- The department changed this document 8 times after first publishing it.
- What prompted each amendment, and was the closing date extended to give bidders time to respond?
- Do the eligibility and scope requirements match the stated purpose and estimated value?
- Were all amendments published on the portal before the deadline?