CBSE
EMD for CBSE ASL assessment set at ₹5 lakh, RFP cost ₹5,000
The Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) is seeking an agency to assess speaking and listening skills of students in Classes IX and XI across CBSE-affiliated schools for the academic years 2013-2018, including development of teacher…
The Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) is seeking an agency to assess speaking and listening skills of students in Classes IX and XI across CBSE-affiliated schools for the academic years 2013-2018, including development of teacher and learner support materials.
Who can bid: Bidders must have: international experience conducting formal benchmarking tests mapped to CEFR levels; expertise in assessing interactive communication skills; experience developing tests for Secondary/Sr. Secondary levels; experience benchmarking speaking/listening skills in India; financial turnover of INR 30 million or more in the last two financial years (2010-2011, 2011-2012); and must not be a board or organization responsible for conducting examinations or issuing school leaving certificates.
Key terms
- EMD: Rs. 5,00,000/-
- RFP document cost: Rs. 5,000/-
- Financial turnover requirement: INR 30 million or above for 2010-2011 and 2011-2012
- Bid validity: Not stated in document
How this was written
An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.
✓ Figures checked. Every number in this summary was found in the document by an automated check.
That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.
The original document
Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE)
Tender · 1 Jan 2013
Read it here
Questions a citizen might ask
Observations drawn mechanically from the documents — not findings or allegations.
- The department changed this document 1 time after first publishing it.
- It is among the most-amended tenders for this body in our archive (4 corrigenda recorded).
- What prompted each amendment, and was the closing date extended to give bidders time to respond?
- Do the eligibility and scope requirements match the stated purpose and estimated value?
- Were all amendments published on the portal before the deadline?
Discussion
No one has discussed this document yet.