कौन ज़िम्मेदार? KaunZimmedar

CBSE seeks ₹5 lakh bid for ASL assessment in Classes IX and XI

The Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) is seeking a bidder to assess speaking and listening skills of students in Classes IX and XI across CBSE-affiliated schools for the academic years 2013-2018, including developing assessment methods and materials.

Bidders must have: international experience conducting benchmarking tests mapped to CEFR levels; expertise in assessing interactive communication skills; experience developing tests for Secondary and Sr. Secondary levels; experience benchmarking speaking and listening skills in India; financial turnover of INR 30 million or more in the last two financial years (2010-2011, 2011-2012); and must not be a board or organization responsible for conducting examinations or issuing school leaving certificates.

  • EMD: Rs. 5,00,000/-
  • Bid submission deadline: 4 June 2013
  • Bid validity: not stated
  • Contract duration: not stated
  • Estimated value: not stated

Written from the document by AI, and checked against it. The original below is authoritative.

The original document

Notice 2013-01-01
Tap “Open the PDF” above to view this document.
Corrigendum 1 2013-01-01
Tap “Open the PDF” above to view this document.
Corrigendum 2 2013-01-01
Tap “Open the PDF” above to view this document.
Corrigendum 3 2013-01-01
Tap “Open the PDF” above to view this document.
Corrigendum 4 2013-01-01
Tap “Open the PDF” above to view this document.
Document details
Official titleAssessment Of Speaking And Listening Skills (ASL) Of Students In CBSE Schools For Classes IX & XI (Academic Years 2013-2018)
Source bodyCentral Board of Secondary Education (CBSE)
Reference number
Statusclosed (academic_archive)
Year2013
Closing dateExtended to 14.6.2013 upto 2 pm
Documents5 · changed 4× after publishing
Observations & questions a citizen might ask

Factual observations drawn mechanically from the documents — not findings or allegations. Verify each against the original.

  • The department changed this document 4 times after first publishing it.
  • It is among the most-amended tenders for this body in our archive (4 corrigenda recorded).
  • What prompted each amendment, and was the closing date extended to give bidders time to respond?
  • Do the eligibility and scope requirements match the stated purpose and estimated value?
  • Were all amendments published on the portal before the deadline?

📄 Draft an RTI to ask what the documents don't say

Discussion (0)

Citizens discussing these documents. A discussion space — nothing here is verified fact or an official finding. Reading is free; sign in to take part.

Open discussion (0) →