Saturday, 7 November 2026 कौन ज़िम्मेदार?
कौन ज़िम्मेदार?KaunZimmedar

Every story is a real government document.

Parliament Parliamentary Committee

Only 32.8% of claims recovered under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code

The Standing Committee on Finance examined the working of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) and emerging issues to identify procedural delays, recovery shortfalls, and gaps in rights for stakeholders like homebuyers and MSMEs.

Who it concerns: This concerns the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), banks and financial institutions, distressed companies, homebuyers, and MSMEs involved in insolvency proceedings.

What the committee found

  • Post-resolution challenges: The Committee identified delays in regulatory clearances and difficulty securing fresh financing due to defaulter status; it recommended an online mechanism for issuing 'no dues' certificates and statutory clearances.
  • Delays and judicial capacity: The Committee cited NCLT bench shortages, vacancies, and frivolous litigation as causes for delays; it recommended expediting additional NCLT benches, operationalizing a centralized case management platform, raising penalties for frivolous applications, and mandating upfront deposits for unsuccessful applicants.
  • Valuation of distressed assets: The Committee noted that only 32.8% of admitted claims are recovered despite creditors realizing 170% of liquidation value, attributed to late entry into the process and lack of valuation transparency; it recommended enterprise value-based valuation, global outreach for competitive bidding, and SOPs for post-resolution valuation reviews.
  • Homebuyer rights: The Committee observed that homebuyers lack an independent right to relief and rely on the Committee of Creditors' discretion; it recommended reconsidering eligibility criteria and inter-ministerial coordination.
  • Cross-border insolvency: The Committee recommended selective adoption of the UNCITRAL framework with modifications to address losses in high-value cases.
  • Pre-institutional mediation: The Committee recommended introducing an early-stage mediation process as an alternative dispute resolution mechanism.
  • Avoidance Transactions: The Committee highlighted fund diversion as a critical concern causing value erosion; it recommended empowering Resolution Professionals to conduct deeper, time-bound investigations.
  • Pre-packaged Insolvency Resolution Process (PPIRP): The Committee noted low uptake by MSMEs due to infrastructural and procedural gaps, pushing banks to use SARFAESI; it recommended simplifying PPIRP procedures, issuing clear guidelines, increasing awareness, and providing incentives for banks.

Also in the document

  • The Committee observed that while creditors realize 170% of the liquidation value, only 32.8% of the total admitted claims are recovered.
  • The Committee identified that firms often enter the insolvency resolution process when their assets are already heavily stressed, which reduces realization value.

How this was written

An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.

✓ Figures checked. Every number in this summary was found in the document by an automated check.

That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.

How we work · Report an error in this story

The original document

Parliamentary Standing Committee reports (via PRS Legislative Research)

Committee report · Ref. review-of-working-of-insolvency-and-bankruptcy-code-and-emerging-issues

Committee report 0.2 MB Open the document On prsindia.org ↗
Read it here

Discussion

Discuss the documents, not people. No doxxing of private individuals. Do not state allegations of crime or wrongdoing as fact — ask questions instead. Be civil. Posts that break these rules may be removed by moderators.

Sign in with Google to post

No one has discussed this document yet.