CBSE
CBSE awards ₹5 lakh contract for 5-year assessment project
The Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) is contracting a single organization to provide item development, project management, psychometric and data analysis, and reporting of results for Problem Solving Assessments for Classes IX…
The Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) is contracting a single organization to provide item development, project management, psychometric and data analysis, and reporting of results for Problem Solving Assessments for Classes IX and XI from 2012 to 2016.
Who can bid: Organizations must have prior experience providing all core services for large-scale assessments (500,000+ candidates annually) for the last two years, a minimum turnover of INR 30 million for the last two financial years (2010-2011 and 2011-2012), and must have a registered office in India with sufficient permanent staff. They must also submit an Earnest Money Deposit (EMD) of Rs 5,00,000.
Key terms
- EMD: Rs 5,00,000
- Bid validity: Not stated
- Contract duration: 2012 to 2016 (5 years)
- Tender type: Open (RFP)
How this was written
An AI model running on our own computer read the government document and wrote this summary. No person has checked it.
✓ Figures checked. Every number in this summary was found in the document by an automated check.
That check compares numbers only. It cannot confirm that the wording says what the document says — so the original document is always the authority.
The original document
Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE)
Tender · 1 Jan 2012
Read it here
Questions a citizen might ask
Observations drawn mechanically from the documents — not findings or allegations.
- The department changed this document 1 time after first publishing it.
- What prompted each amendment, and was the closing date extended to give bidders time to respond?
- Do the eligibility and scope requirements match the stated purpose and estimated value?
- Were all amendments published on the portal before the deadline?
Discussion
No one has discussed this document yet.