Supreme Court restores acquittal in 1988 murder case
The case concerns a criminal appeal challenging a High Court order that remitted a 1988 murder case back to the Trial Court for re-consideration of evidence, specifically eyewitness testimony and recoveries under Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act. The Supreme Court reviewed whether the acquittal of the accused should be restored based on the credibility of the prosecution's evidence.
Appellants: Khalil Pasha & Ors. (Accused); Respondents: Abdul Rasheed & Anr. (Victim's side/Revision Petitioners); Bench: Justice K. Vinod Chandran.
- The Court granted leave to appeal.
- The Court observed that the question regarding whether a revision petition by a victim must be heard by a Division Bench or Single Bench is academic due to statutory changes.
- The Court noted that under the 2009 amendment to Section 372 Cr.P.C., victims have a statutory right to appeal against acquittals, which supersedes revision in such cases.
- The Court decided to consider the matter on a re-appreciation of the evidence led before the Trial Court.
- The Court analyzed the testimony of eyewitnesses (PW3, PW4, PW8) and doctors (PW1, PW11), noting inconsistencies regarding the deceased's consciousness and the scene of occurrence.
- The Court highlighted that the recoveries under Section 27 of the Indian Evidence Act and chemical analysis reports were part of the prosecution's case but did not explicitly state the final order on the conviction/acquittal status in the provided text, though the title suggests the acquittal was restored.
Written from the document by AI, and checked against it. The original below is authoritative.
The original document
Document details
| Official title | Evidence Act | Section 27 Recoveries Alone Can't Sustain Conviction : Supreme Court Restores Acquittal In 1988 Murder Case |
| Source body | Supreme Court of India — orders & judgments |
| Reference number | — |
| Status | closed (order) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Closing date | — |
| Documents | 1 |