कौन ज़िम्मेदार? KaunZimmedar

Zero forest land diversion in Pune project, environmental clearance granted

This document grants prior Environmental Clearance for a proposed residential and commercial project by M/s Tanish Realities located in Charholi Bk, Taluka Haveli, Pune district, Maharashtra. The project involves the construction of buildings covering approximately 187,097 square meters on a 3.348-hectare plot.

The project proponent is M/s Tanish Realities. The clearance was granted by the State Environment Impact Assessment Authority (SEIAA), Maharashtra.

  • Clearance Status: Fresh Environmental Clearance (Category B1) granted on 28/07/2026.
  • Land Area: 3.348 hectares of non-forest land; 0 hectares of forest land.
  • Project Cost: 57,270 lakhs; EMP Cost: 754 lakhs.
  • Condition: Proponent must obtain all mandatory NOCs and plan approvals from local planning authorities.
  • Condition: Project must be made a plastic-free zone.
  • Condition: Treated sewage must meet standards set by the National Green Tribunal order dated 30.04.2019.
  • Condition: Electric vehicle charging facilities must be provided as per the Maharashtra Electric Vehicle Policy, 2025.
  • Condition: Minimum 5% energy saving must be achieved using non-conventional energy sources.
  • Condition: Construction and demolition waste must be managed as per the 2016 Rules.

Written from the document by AI, and checked against it. The original below is authoritative.

The original document

Clearance 2026-05-18
Tap “Open the PDF” above to view this document.
Document details
Official titleProposed Residential & Commercial Project at S. No. 310/1,311/1(P), Charholi Bk, Tal- Haveli, Pune by M/s Tanish Realities.
Source bodyPARIVESH — Environmental & Forest Clearances (MoEFCC)
Reference numberSIA/MH/INFRA2/559514/2026
Statusclosed (clearance)
Year2026
Closing date
Documents1

Discussion (0)

Citizens discussing these documents. A discussion space — nothing here is verified fact or an official finding. Reading is free; sign in to take part.

Open discussion (0) →