New Construction Project “Rohan Abhilasha 5” at Wagholi Haveli Pune by Rohan Builders and Developers Pvt. Ltd.
Plain-language summary (AI-generated) — a quick read so you don't have to open the full PDF. May contain errors; the original document below is authoritative.
What is this clearance for?
The project is a new construction of 'Rohan Abhilasha 5' at Wagholi Haveli Pune by Rohan Builders and Developers Pvt. Ltd., involving a township/area development project in Pune, Maharashtra, with no forest land diversion.
Who it concerns
M/S.ROHAN BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PVT LTD (project proponent) and SEIAA (State Environment Impact Assessment Authority, Maharashtra) (granting authority).
Key facts & conditions
- Clearance status: Fresh EC
- Area involved: 12.734 Ha (Non-Forest Land: 12.734 Ha, Forest Land: 0 Ha)
- Capacity/size: Project cost 101000 lacs, EMP cost 1613 lacs
- Conditions: Replace specific trees with indigenous trees, make project plastic-free, achieve sewage standards, manage construction waste, provide electric charging facilities, achieve 5% energy saving via non-conventional sources.
| Source body | PARIVESH — Environmental & Forest Clearances (MoEFCC) |
| Reference number | SIA/MH/INFRA2/568881/2026 |
| Status | closed (section: clearance) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Closing date | — |
| Documents | 1 |
Highlights & Points worth asking
Auto-generated, neutral observations. Auto-generated from public documents. May contain errors. Not legal or financial advice. Always verify against the linked original document. KaunZimmedar is a platform, not an authority.
No automated observations for this document. Read the documents below directly.
Documents
The original government PDF is the authoritative source — shown below, or open it full-screen in a new tab.
Clearance
2026-06-12
SIA-MH-INFRA2-568881-2026.pdf
Tap “Open the PDF” above to view this document.
Discussion (0)
Citizens discussing these documents. A discussion space — nothing here is verified fact or an official finding. Reading is free; sign in to take part.
Open discussion (0) →